Read.ai
Cybersecurity statistics about read.ai
Showing 541-560 of 10000 results
56% of security leaders now experience cybersecurity-related downtime caused by SaaS and other third-party application issues often or very often, nearly triple the rate in 2024.
Organizations spend a median of $24.5 million annually on AI tools that prevent and respond to downtime.
Nearly 20% of marketing professionals report it takes an entire quarter to recover brand health after remediation.
98% of organizations with the lowest downtime costs confirm end-to-end visibility is very or extremely important for reducing incidents.
71% of technology executives rate publicly disclosing a data breach as very or prohibitively disruptive, up from 23% in 2024.
90% of tech leaders report increased demand for customer support during downtime.
All technology leaders report their organization has experienced some form of AI-related downtime.
68% of technology leaders express concern that their AI agents will behave unpredictably.
About three-fourths of ITOps and engineering leaders identify end-to-end observability as their top investment priority to improve infrastructure resilience.
66% of ITOps and engineering leaders are prioritizing investments in automation to mitigate the risks of human error.
85% of technology leaders prioritize AI-driven security automation.
2,130 AI-related vulnerabilities were reported in 2025, a more than 200% increase since 2023.
Of the 48,000+ CVEs published in 2025, only 58 represented a genuine, discoverable, and exploitable threat to enterprise supply chains.
More than 48,000 CVEs were published in 2025, an 18% increase year-over-year.
97% of organizations commit to implementing AI.
57% of organizations report a significant capacity gap in AI security and risk management.
Capability gaps exist across the AI stack: 57% report gaps in AI security and risk management, 57% in AI operations and monitoring, 54% in cost optimization, and 45% in AI infrastructure expertise.
57% of organizations are upskilling existing staff as the primary response to talent gaps, compared with 49% hiring new technical staff.
Upskilling outperforms hiring: it provides a 7.9x advantage in business context, a 7.7x advantage in staff retention, a 7.3x advantage in team cohesion, a 5x advantage in total cost, and a 3.5x advantage in quality of work.
Mobile application attack rates climbed 58% between 2022 and 2026, rising from 55% to 87%.