42% of consumers aged 55-64 years old are willing to pay for scam protection.

74% of Indonesians said government regulation of AI is incredibly important (the highest rate).

30% of schools have experienced students creating harmful AI content (deepfakes of peers, etc.).

90% of faculty are at least “somewhat concerned” about AI-related cybersecurity threats.

37% of faculty express substantial worry about reputational harm related to AI.

52% of faculty are concerned about deepfake impersonation of staff/students due to AI.

12% of consumers admit they don’t get scam information from any source at all.

Less than a quarter (23%) of respondents felt very confident in their own scam-identifying abilities.

Comcast Business blocked 1.1M spam-source C2 attempts.

5.5% of the analyzed AI-enhanced scams used AI to contact and engage with victims.

40% of students use AI for revision support.

32% of education institutions feel “very prepared” to handle AI-related cybersecurity threats over the next 1–2 years.

Only one in four educators feels truly confident in their ability to spot an AI scam.

Only 22% of consumers believe a typical mobile app’s code is mostly AI-generated.

In Vietnam, the figure for willingness to pay for scam protection climbs to 84%.

33% of consumers would be more cautious if they learned that AI-generated code caused a vulnerability in an app they used.

In Indonesia, 50% of respondents reported high levels of concern about identity theft or fraud.

32% of respondents said they trust gambling/betting services the least with their identity data.

Stolen credentials were involved in approximately 25% of ransomware attacks in 2025, up from an estimated 20% in 2024.

35% of respondents from the Netherlands said government regulation of AI is incredibly important.