Skip to main content
VendorsCobalt

Cobalt

Cybersecurity reports and statistics published by Cobalt

8 categories7 reports

Recent Statistics & Reports

LLMs have the lowest resolution rate of all application types, with just 38% of high-risk issues being fixed.

5/27/2026
LLM TestingVulnerability Remediation

The typical organization ultimately resolves 86% of its high-risk findings, but only 52% of high-risk findings are remediated within a five-year time frame.

5/27/2026
Vulnerability RemediationLong-Term Remediation

Top-performing organizations have a high-risk finding half-life of 10 days, while bottom-tier organizations have a 249-day half-life—an eight-month gap in exposure.

5/27/2026
Vulnerability RemediationRisk ExposureOperational Performance

97% of security professionals state they are adding AI capabilities to their software and services.

5/27/2026
AI AdoptionSoftware Development

61% of security professionals want a "strategic pause" to calibrate defenses against AI-driven threats, up from 48% last year.

5/27/2026
AI SecurityAI-Driven ThreatsSecurity Strategy

32% of AI/LLM findings are rated as high risk, nearly 2.7x the overall high-risk rate of 12%.

5/27/2026
AI TestingLLM TestingVulnerabilities

33% of organizations reported significant security budget growth in the past year, while 50% saw incremental increases.

5/27/2026
Security BudgetsFundingRisk Management

One in five organizations experienced an LLM security incident in the last year, while a further 18% are unsure and 19% preferred not to answer.

5/27/2026
Security IncidentsLLM Security IncidentOrganizational Risk

57% of C-suite executives believe their organization consistently meets remediation SLAs, yet only 15% of security practitioners agree.

5/27/2026
GovernanceSLAsSecurity Operations

Security teams' confidence in their ability to keep up with the security implications of AI adoption declined from 64% to 51%.

5/27/2026
Security ConfidenceAI SecurityAI Adoption

15% of professional pentesters rank public bug bounties as the most effective model for uncovering complex vulnerabilities.

5/27/2026
Bug BountyVulnerability DiscoveryPenetration Testing

51% of professional pentesters cite the pressure to be the first to submit a finding as their primary frustration with bug bounty programs.

5/27/2026
Bug BountyOffensive SecurityPenetration Testing

30% of all bug bounty submissions are invalid or low-value "noise."

5/27/2026
Bug BountySecurity OperationsVulnerability Triage

98% of professional pen testers prefer the PTaaS model over bug bounties.

5/27/2026
PTaaSBug BountyPenetration Testing

54% of professional pentesters report having discovered a Zero-Day or N-Day vulnerability that had no existing public patch or advisory.

5/27/2026
Zero-DayVulnerability DiscoveryOffensive Security

1% of professional pentesters believe AI-only scanning is effective for uncovering high-impact, exploitable vulnerabilities.

5/27/2026
AI SecurityVulnerability DiscoveryOffensive Security

58% of professional pentesters rank PTaaS as the most effective model for uncovering complex vulnerabilities.

5/27/2026
Penetration TestingPTaaSVulnerability Discovery

The Median Time to Remediation (MTTR) for serious findings is 61 days in the financial services industry. This ranks financial services 11th of 13 industries measured.

9/30/2025
Financial servicesPen testMTTR

Server security misconfigurations: 34.9% in the financial services industry (versus 27.9% average in other industries).

9/30/2025
Financial servicesPen testVulnerabilities

Sensitive data exposure: 10.5% in the financial services industry (versus 8.0% average in other industries).

9/30/2025
Financial servicesPen testVulnerabilities

Showing 1-20 of 95 results