TPRM
We've curated 33 cybersecurity statistics about TPRM to help you understand how third-party risk management is crucial for safeguarding your organization against vulnerabilities introduced by vendors and partners in 2025.
Top Vendors
Showing 1-20 of 33 results
73% of large organizations with 5,001 or more employees fall into the lowest TPRM confidence tiers.
72% of financial institutions are only partially aware of which vendors use AI, and 0% feel extremely confident managing vendor AI.
Financial institutions using manual TPRM processes are 71% more likely to receive exam findings.
Individual TPRM professionals are responsible for 100 or more vendor relationships.
13% of the most mature TPRM programs view TPRM as little more than a compliance formality.
Nearly 87% of financial institutions use TPRM software.
53% of TPRM programs manage 300 or more vendors.
10% of financial institutions still rely on spreadsheets, down from 13% in 2025.
Financial institutions using manual TPRM processes report 50% lower satisfaction with their tools.
63% of TPRM programs operate with just one or two dedicated full-time employees.
13% of TPRM programs have no dedicated staff.
67% of organizations with no TPRM processes view TPRM as little more than a compliance formality.
26% of the most mature TPRM programs report TPRM delivering high value across the organization.
Only 16% of organizations listed risk reduction as the primary driver for their third-party risk management programs.
96% of organizations plan to grow their third-party ecosystems over the next year.
46% of organizations reported having established and optimized third-party risk management (TPRM) programs.
41% of organisations still rely on spreadsheets to assess third parties.
14% of TPRM programmes actively use Artificial Intelligence (AI).
As a result of TPRM teams being understaffed, organisations are only managing about 40% of their vendor population.
Nearly half (approximately 50%) of programmes cite departmental silos as a major barrier.