99% of organizations see value in using AI to support automatically generating training campaigns and workflows.

More than half (53%) of respondents agreed that the effort required to run their current SAT tools outweighs their impact.

While 99% of organizations experienced incidents tied to human error, the vast majority stated they struggle to implement effective, scalable SAT programs.

Nearly all of the organizations surveyed (99%) are in favour of including AI in future SAT tools and workflows.

95% of organizations see value in using AI to Automatically create individualized attack simulations based on individual user profiles.

83% of respondents agreed that their current SAT tools require substantial effort to operate and maintain.

95% of organizations see value in using AI to Automate the creation of training videos.

99% of organizations experienced security incidents linked to avoidable human error.

Many SAT programmes exist primarily to satisfy regulatory or insurance requirements.

95% of organizations see value in using AI to Conduct conversational coaching by leveraging LLMs.

96% of organizations see value in using AI to Create dynamic risk scores based on past user behaviour and the types of attacks targeting certain types of users.

75% of organizations require employees to complete security awareness training at least quarterly.