Fraud detection
We've curated 13 cybersecurity statistics about Fraud detection to help you understand how advanced techniques are identifying deceptive practices, analyzing transaction patterns, and leveraging machine learning to combat financial fraud in 2025.
Showing 1-13 of 13 results
Attempted misuse cases caught by financial institutions increase by 26.8%.
78% of financial institutions make improving mule account detection a high or top priority over the next 12 months.
Over 50% of fraud prevention, risk, and compliance professionals say account handover fraud, where control of a verified account shifts to someone else without authorization, is more difficult to detect than other types of fraud.
More than 80% of fraud prevention, risk, and compliance professionals report that mule activity is detected reactively rather than prevented before suspicious transactions occur.
Currently, 32% of senior corporate security leaders say real-time fraud detection is largely run with agentic AI; this is expected to rise to 58% in two years.
SMBs plan to use AI in 2026 for threat detection (39%), incident response (34%), fraud detection (34%), and automated phishing detection (31%).
38% of internal audit functions test or strengthen fraud prevention and detection.
23% of UK consumers cite fraud detection and prevention as the most positive impact of AI in banking in 2025.
66% of B2B SaaS respondents express high confidence in current fraud prevention tools to detect AI-powered attacks.
44% of respondents in sectors other than B2B SaaS/overall average are very confident in current fraud prevention tools to detect AI-powered attacks.
42% of UK CFOs surveyed identified fraud detection and prevention as an area of their finance operations they would most like to improve through automation.
More than 43% of Americans say AI-powered fraud detection would increase their confidence in their financial institution.
Nearly 72% of Americans are either “somewhat,” “very,” or “extremely” interested in AI-powered fraud detection tools.