AI Coding Assistants
Cybersecurity statistics about ai coding assistants
Related Topics
Showing 1-20 of 32 results
90% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs say business pressure to enable AI building has increased in the past 12 months.
38% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs call vibe-coded tools running in production a top operational risk.
31% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs say their organization's tolerance for friction in enabling AI building is near zero.
22% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs indicate their organizations have had at least one AI-caused production incident.
19% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs can definitively say their organizations have not had an AI-caused production incident because of monitoring they have in place.
93% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs are concerned about vibe-coded tools running in production.
59% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs cannot confirm whether their organizations have had an AI-caused production incident.
Nearly 90% of development teams encounter issues with AI-generated code.
86% of development professionals believe an AI agent or model should evaluate AI-generated code.
56% of development professionals prefer a dedicated AI security agent separate from the code-generation tool to evaluate AI-generated code.
30% of development professionals believe the same AI model that generated the code should also review it for security issues.
84% of developers prefer to keep a human in the loop via pull requests or real-time IDE suggestions when using AI-assisted development.
52% of development teams experience bottlenecks in manual review related to AI-generated code.
58% of development teams cite a major improvement in productivity and release velocity from AI coding assistants.
AI coding assistants have 97% adoption among enterprise development teams.
48% of development teams experience bottlenecks in code rework related to AI-generated code.
92% of development teams report improved productivity and release velocity when using AI coding assistants.
97% of development teams have adopted AI coding assistants.
Developers will spend 29% more time reviewing and validating AI-generated code, 29% more time on complex architecture and system design, and 23% more time on security verification and risk management.
30% of development teams have full governance in place for AI coding assistant adoption and oversight.