65% of IT leaders report fragmented ownership of data

67% of organizations report fragmented security policies

85% of organizations agree that fragmented identity systems and tools impact or delay their ability to detect and respond to identity-related threats.

73% of U.S. cybersecurity decision-makers cite disconnected or poorly integrated tools as creating exploitable gaps, compared with 63% globally.

96% of cybersecurity decision-makers globally cite disconnected or poorly integrated security tools as creating exploitable gaps.

97% of respondents reporting that tool fragmentation adds additional time to identity-related incidents, amounting to an average of 12 hours per incident.

67% of IT professionals report at least moderate fragmentation in their IT environments.

88% of U.S. organizations manage two or more identity security tools, creating fragmentation that introduces blind spots.

Nearly 3 in 4 organizations in the United States have a fragmented IAM stack.

75% of decision-makers at financial institutions cited system fragmentation as a top AML (Anti-Money Laundering) challenge.

57% of organisations reported they are grappling with fragmented SaaS security administration.

Too many organisations are relying on fragmented strategies, such as vendor-native tools (69%), general-purpose solutions like Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs) (43%), and manual audits (46%)

52% of surveyed executives note that the fragmentation of security solutions is limiting their ability to deal with cyber threats.

41% of executives say security fragmentation has driven up procurement costs.

Surveyed executives estimate that security fragmentation and complexity costs their organisations an average of 5% of their annual revenue.