Skip to main content

Cybersecurity statistics / AI-Generated Code

90% of security leaders have active concerns about security risks introduced by AI-generated code.

PublisherSalt Security
ReportAI Coding Assistants and the New Security Challenge
Published2 June 2026
TopicsAI-Generated Code, AI Security, Risk Management

Published by Salt Security in AI Coding Assistants and the New Security Challenge, 2 June 2026. The figure is taken from the report as published; the full methodology is in the source.

View the original report

Compare this across sources

12 sources answer what share of organisations have an ai governance policy in place. They report between 18% and 44%, with a median of 36.5%.

See all 12 sources

Related statistics

64% of development teams express moderate or extreme concern about AI coding assistants introducing security defects or vulnerabilities.
Black Duck, 15/06/2026
51% of development teams experience bottlenecks in security testing related to AI-generated code.
Black Duck, 15/06/2026
48% of development teams experience bottlenecks in code rework related to AI-generated code.
Black Duck, 15/06/2026
15% of security leaders cite misalignment with internal security policies as a major concern with AI-generated code.
Salt Security, 06/06/2026
67% of organizations report that AI coding assistants are now widely adopted across development teams.
Salt Security, 06/06/2026
38% of organizations still rely primarily on manual review for AI-generated code.
Salt Security, 06/06/2026

Get the newsletter

Weekly cybersecurity statistics by email.