Skip to main content
Cybersecurity Statistics

Cybersecurity statistics / Accountability

22% of federal IT and cybersecurity decision makers say their organizations have not clearly determined who bears responsibility when an AI agent causes a security incident or operational failure

PublisherBooz Allen
ReportVelocity V5: Reimagining Cyber for a Faster Fight
Published21 July 2026
TopicsAccountability, AI Governance, Federal agencies

Published by Booz Allen in Velocity V5: Reimagining Cyber for a Faster Fight, 21 July 2026. The figure is taken from the report as published; the full methodology is in the source.

View the original report

Compare this across sources

12 sources answer what share of organisations have an ai governance policy in place. They report between 18% and 44%, with a median of 36.5%.

See all 12 sources

Related statistics

8% of cybersecurity professionals report a lack of clear ownership when AI recommendations are incorrect.
ISC2, 18/07/2026
21% said the chief privacy officer was primarily accountable for privacy.
ISACA, 01/01/2025
The share of organizations requiring human review before high-risk AI actions dropped from 40% to 25% in six months.
JumpCloud Inc., 18/07/2026
Organizations have adopted fewer than one-third of standard AI governance and security practices.
JumpCloud Inc., 18/07/2026
Only 21% of organizations have implemented controls for non-human identities (NHIs).
JumpCloud Inc., 18/07/2026
80% of cybersecurity professionals say having clear governance frameworks in place for AI is very important.
ISC2, 18/07/2026

Get the newsletter

Weekly cybersecurity statistics by email.